Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Simon Furst's avatar

I don't mean to be a spoilsport, but in terms of the quality of the music Israel clearly did not deserve second place. (I'm not saying it wasn't good, but far from winning quality. IMO at least 5 countries were significantly better then us.) We only got that due to political support (and maybe also connected to the message of the song). And that is expected whether most people are pro or anti Israel. Points are awarded based on more votes than other participants, not the majority of the votes. Any country which is politically relevant like Israel (or Ukraine) will automatically garner more attention and take one of the top spots in most countries. So Israel did well with the public due to relevance (unlike San Marino or Malta which have little recognition, and even the UK and France lack the benefit of people having strong opinions about them.) The other countries that did well with the popular vote either had an extraordinary performance/song or had some event, story or controversy which caused the song to go viral and get attention (such as Estonia and Sweden). Regarding the jury Israel performed about as well as expected, especially in light of the fact that other strong songs got even less jury votes such as Spain and Norway, and other countries with strong entries performed only nominally better such as Malta, Germany and Finland. (I'm not a big music expert, but these are my opinions about the actual entries.)

Expand full comment
25 more comments...

No posts